Exploring technologies through imaginary worlds: At the intersection of science fiction and technology assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.7368Keywords:
science fiction, imaginary worlds, speculation, cultural studies, technology assessmentAbstract
This introduction explores the convergence between technology assessment (TA) and science fiction (SF) as complementary approaches to technological futures. While TA generates knowledge for decision making based on scientifically grounded, plausible scenarios, SF uses speculation to create dense, internally coherent imaginary worlds and compelling narratives. However, there are overlaps in three areas: (1) Futures exploration: SF functions as narrative technology assessment with a strong focus on cultural change. (2) Expectation management: SF shapes visions of the future and creates feedback loops between fiction and technology development. (3) Cultural reflection: Speculative worlds serve as ciphers for existing grievances such as those related to power, labor, and identity. The contributions to this Special topic illustrate the methodological versatility of the combination of SF and TA and the potential both approaches hold for each other.References
Altman, Sam (2024): her. In: X, 13.05.2024. Available online at https://x.com/sama/status/1790075827666796666, last accessed on 08.05.2026.
Bankston, Kevin (2019): The sci-fi feedback loop. In: Open Transcripts, 05.07.2019. Available online at http://opentranscripts.org/transcript/sci-fi-feedback-loop/, last accessed on 08.05.2026.
Belsunces, Andreu (2025): Sociotechnical fictions. The performative agencies of fiction in technological development. In: Science & Technology Studies, pp. 1–21. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.131333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.131333
Belsunces, Andreu; Forlano, Laura (2026): World(coin) in the AI future. How sociotechnical fictions are instrumental to the cyberlibertarian transition. In: AI & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-02913-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-02913-1
Berne, Rosalyn; Schummer, Joachim (2005): Teaching societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology to engineering students through science fiction. In: Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 25 (6), pp. 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467605283048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467605283048
Bina, Olivia; Inch, Andy; Pereira, Lavínia (2020): Beyond techno-utopia and its discontents. On the role of utopianism and speculative fiction in shaping alternatives to the smart city imaginary. In: Futures 115, p. 102475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.102475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.102475
Bina, Olivia; Mateus, Sandra; Pereira, Lavinia; Caffa, Annalisa (2017): The future imagined. Exploring fiction as a means of reflecting on today’s grand societal challenges and tomorrow’s options. In: Futures 86, pp. 166–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.009
Bishop, Peter; Hines, Andy; Collins, Terry (2007): The current state of scenario development. An overview of techniques. In: Foresight 9 (1), pp. 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680710727516 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680710727516
Čapek, Karel (2004): R. U. R. (rossum’s universal robots). East Rutherford, NJ: Penguin Classics.
Cave, Stephen; Dihal, Kanta (2023): Imagining AI. How the world sees intelligent machines. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192865366.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192865366.001.0001
Cave, Stephen; Dihal, Kanta; Dillon, Sarah (2020): AI narratives. A history of imaginative thinking about intelligent machines. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198846666.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198846666.001.0001
Chu, Seo-Young (2010): Do metaphors dream of literal sleep? A science-fictional theory of representation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674262652 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674059221
Cohen, Julie (2018). Turning privacy inside out. In: Social Science Research Network, Theoretical Inquiries in Law 20 (1), forthcoming. Available online at https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3162178, last accessed on 11.05.2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2019-0002
Cuhls, Kerstin; Wasserbacher, Dana; Weber, Matthias (2022): Evidenz, Vorausschau und demokratische Beteiligung für Horizon Europe. Erfahrungen mit neuen Prozessmodellen. In: Alexander Bogner, Michael Decker, Michael Nentwich and Constanze Scherz (eds.): Digitalisierung und die Zukunft der Demokratie. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 155–172. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748928928-155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748928928-155
Gernsback, Hugo (2017): Editorial. A new sort of magazine. In: Rob Latham (ed.): Science fiction criticism. An anthology of essential writings. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 11–12. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474248655.0006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474248655.0006
Grunwald, Armin (2009): Technology assessment. Concepts and methods. In: Anthonie Meijers (ed.): Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences. Handbook of the philosophy of science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science & Technology, pp. 1103–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51667-1.50044-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51667-1.50044-6
Grunwald, Armin (2012): Technikzukünfte als Medium von Zukunftsdebatten und Technikgestaltung. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5445/KSP/1000030441
Grunwald, Armin (2014): Modes of orientation provided by futures studies. Making sense of diversity and divergence. In: European Journal of Futures Research 2 (1), p. 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-013-0030-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-013-0030-5
Hermann, Isabella (2023a): Artificial intelligence in fiction. Between narratives and metaphors. In: AI & Society 38 (1), pp. 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01299-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01299-6
Hermann, Isabella (2023b): Science-Fiction zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius Verlag.
Jameson, Fredric (1975): World-reduction in Le Guin. The emergence of utopian narrative. In: Science Fiction Studies 2 (3), pp. 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1525/sfs.2.3.0221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sfs.2.3.0221
Jameson, Fredric (2005): Archaeologies of the future. The desire called utopia and other science fictions. New York, NY: Verso.
Jones, Julian (2005): How William Shatner changed the world. London: Mentorn.
Jonze, Spike (2014): her. Los Angeles, CA: Annapurna Pictures.
Le Guin, Ursula K. (1976): Introduction. In: The left hand of darkness. New York, NY: Ace.
Lösch, Andreas (2022): Vision Assessment sozioepistemischer Praktiken. Theoretische Positionierung und Plausibilisierung des TA-Ansatzes. In: Philipp Frey et al. (eds.): Vision Assessment. Theoretische Reflexionen zur Erforschung soziotechnischer Zukünfte. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing, pp. 51–84. https://doi.org/10.5445/KSP/1000142150
Mehnert, Wenzel (2021): Deconstructing cyberpunk worlds. Technodystopian imaginaries in the storyworld of Gibson’s neuromancer. In: Christoph Ernst and Jens Schröter (eds.): (Re‑)Imagining new media. Techno-imaginaries around 2000 and the case of ‘piazza virtuale’ (1992). Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 63–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-32899-3_6
Mehnert, Wenzel (2023): “The future is going to be weird.” Zur Ästhetik kommodifizierter Mind-Upload-Visionen. In: Marco Tamborini (ed.): Die Ästhetik der Technowissenschaften des 21. Jahrhunderts. Darmstadt: wbg Academic, pp. 177–200.
Mehnert, Wenzel (2026): Worldbuilding. Die Zukunfts-Schreib-Werkstatt zur Gestaltung Imaginärer Zukunftswelten von Salzburg. Salzburg: Robert-Jungk-Bibliothek für Zukunftsfragen. Available online at https://jungk-bibliothek.org/2026/01/31/ap-79-worldbuilding/, last accessed on 28.05.2026.
Milburn, Colin (2008): Nanovision. Engineering the future. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822391487
Miles, Ian (1990): Fiction and forecasting. In: Futures 22 (1), pp. 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(90)90099-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(90)90099-4
Miller, Ruth-Ellen (2015): Impact assessment and science fiction. Complementary ways to ask “what happens if…?” and the delineation of a new sub-genre. In: Journal of Futures Studies 20 (2), pp. 105–112.
Noble, Safiya (2018): Algorithms of oppression. How search engines reinforce racism. New York, NY: New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5
O’Toole, Garson (2019): Quote origin. It is easy to predict an automobile in 1880; it is very hard to predict a traffic problem. Available online at https://quoteinvestigator.com/2019/10/23/traffic/, last accessed on 12.05.2026.
Pfirrmann, Oliver; Schmeink, Lars (2023): Szenariobasierte Zukunftsforschung mithilfe von Science-Fiction. In: Zeitschrift für Zukunftsforschung 11 (1), pp. 36–66. https://doi.org/10.63370/zfz.v11i1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63370/zfz.v11i1.4
Rhee, Jennifer (2018): The robotic imaginary. The human and the price of dehumanized labor. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctv62hh4x DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctv62hh4x
Roddenberry, Gene (1966): Star Trek. The original series. Los Angeles, CA: Norway Corporation.
Schmeink, Lars (2016): Biopunk dystopias. Genetic engineering, society and science fiction. Liverpool: Liverpool UP.
Schmeink, Lars (2017): Afterthoughts. Cyberpunk engagements in countervisuality. In: Graham Murphy and Lars Schmeink (eds.): Cyberpunk and visual culture. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/east-2018-0015
Schmeink, Lars (2019): Leben wir in einer ‘Blade Runner’-Welt? In: Deutschlandfunk Kultur, Kompressor, 20.12.2019. Available online at https://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/cyberpunk-jahr-2019-leben-wir-in-einer-blade-runner-welt-100.html, last accessed on 21.05.2026.
Shelley, Mary (2024): Frankenstein, or the modern Prometheus. München: Anaconda Verlag.
Spielberg, Steven (2002): Minority report. Los Angeles, CA: 20th Century Fox.
Steinmüller, Karlheinz (1997): Grundlagen und Methoden der Zukunftsforschung. Szenarien, Delphi, Technikvorausschau. Gelsenkirchen: Sekretariat für Zukunftsforschung.
Steinmüller, Karlheinz (2016): Antizipation als Gedankenexperiment. In: Reinhold Popp (ed.): Einblicke – Ausblicke – Weitblicke. Aktuelle Perspektiven in der Zukunftsforschung. Zürich: Lit, pp. 320–335.
Suvin, Darko (1972): On the poetics of the science fiction genre. In: College English 34 (3), pp. 372–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/375141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ce197218271
Taskale, Ali (2026): Materialized science fiction. The tech oligarchy’s blueprint for a new global order. In: Global Studies Quarterly 6 (1), p. ksag002. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksag002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksag002
Vint, Sherryl (2021): Science fiction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wenzel Mehnert, Isabella Hermann, Andreu Belsunces Gonçalves, Lars Schmeink, Syamsuriatina Ishak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
