Data diaries: Self-reported chronicles on online health platforms and the challenges for technology assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.7172Keywords:
participatory health platforms, self-reporting, data privacy, technology assessment, ethical implicationsAbstract
This research article explores the ethical, social, and economic implications of online health platforms that promote participatory models of data collection and use. These platforms, often hailed as enablers for democratization of healthcare, also raise significant concerns about privacy and the commodification and exploitation of data. Based on qualitative interviews and a literature review, this study examines how such platforms influence global healthcare dynamics. While these platforms foster user empowerment, they also create environments where new forms of surveillance may emerge. This article emphasizes the importance of addressing these concerns through rigorous technology assessment, particularly in regions governed by strict data protection regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe. By examining the socio-ethical challenges posed by these platforms, the study identifies ways to ensure that the benefits of participatory platforms are distributed equitably and ethically.
References
A cura della redazione (2013): Risorse per la ricerca qualitativa. L’esempio del DIPEx. In: Assistenza Infermieristica e Ricerca 32 (4), pp. 202–204. https://doi.org/10.1702/1381.15357
Charmaz, Kathy (2014): Constructing grounded theory. London. SAGE Publications.
Goetz, Thomas (2008): The decision tree. Taking control of your health in the new era of personalized medicine. New York, NY: Rodale.
Guerrini, Christi; Wagner, Jennifer; Nelson, Sara; Javitt, Gail (2020): Who’s on third? Regulation of third-party genetic interpretation services. In: Genetics in Medicine 22 (1), pp. 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0627-6
Hood, Leroy (2013): Systems biology and P4 medicine. Past, present, and future. In: Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal 4 (2), p. e0012. https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10112
Horne, Rob et al. (2015): A new social contract for medical innovation. In: The Lancet 385 (9974), pp. 1153–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60607-9
Househ, Mowafa; Grainger, Rebecca; Petersen, Carolyn; Bamidis, Panagiotis; Merolli, Mark (2018): Balancing between privacy and patient needs for health information in the age of participatory health and social media. A scoping review. In: Yearbook of Medical Informatics 27 (1), pp. 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1641197
Kaplan, Bonnie; Davidson, Elizabeth; Demiris, George; Schreiber, Richard; Waldman, Ari (2019): Rethinking health data privacy. In: AMIA: Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium, Washington, DC, November 16–20, 2019. Bethesda, MD: AMIA, pp. 91–93. Available online at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3501986, last accessed on 28.11.2024.
Landers, Constantin; Ormond, Kelly; Blasimme, Alessandro; Brall, Caroline; Vayena, Effy (2024): Talking ethics early in health data public private partnerships. In: Journal of Business Ethics 190 (3), pp. 649–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05425-w
Lupton, Deborah (2016): The quantified self. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Mackey, Tim; Liang, Bryan; Kohler, Jillian; Attaran, Amir (2014): Health domains for sale. The need for global health internet governance. In: Journal of Medical Internet Research 16 (3), p. e62. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3276
Mahr, Dana (2017): Self-reporting and participatory health platforms. Empowerment through sharing information about oneself online. In: Harvard Bill of Health, 01.05.2017. Available online at https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/, last accessed on 28.11.2024.
Mahr, Dana (2021): The knowledge of experience. Exploring epistemic diversity in digital health, participatory medicine, and environmental research. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3702-5
Marin, Francesca (2017): La salute approda nel mercato. Le questioni etiche relative alla fornitura di informazioni sui rischi di salute / Putting health in the marketplace. Ethical issues about providing online health risk information. In: Medicina e Morale 66 (1), pp. 31–43. https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2017.474
Petrakaki, Dimitra; Hilberg, Eva; Waring, Justin (2021): The cultivation of digital health citizenship. In: Social Science and Medicine 270, p. 113675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113675
Pourrez, Aurélie; Crespel, Elodie; Djahanchahi, Stéphane; Galibert, Olivier; Cordelier, Benoît (2020): Ethical positions arising from research on online communities in the health sector. In: Laurent Morillon (ed.): Health research practices in a digital context. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119779933.ch5
Sands, Danny (2020): Health informatics and why participatory healthcare is key to its future. In: Society for Participatory Medicine, 09.04.2020. Available online at https://participatorymedicine.org/epatients/2020/04/health-informatics-and-why-participatory-healthcare-is-key-to-its-future.html, last accessed on 28.11.2024.
Shukla, Abhay; More, Abhijit; Marathe, Shweta (2018): Making private health care accountable. Mobilising civil society and ethical doctors in India. In: IDS Bulletin 49 (2), pp. 129–146. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2018.140
Thompson, Edward (1966): The making of the English working class. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Tu, Jiaobing; Gao, Wei (2021): Ethical considerations of wearable technologies in human research. In: Advanced Healthcare Materials 10 (17), p. 2100127. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202100127
Whitmore, Lindsey (2012): Our bodies, their data. Tracing biopolitical circuitry and the illness experience on PatientsLikeMe.com. In: Gnovis Journal, 26.04.2013. Available online at https://gnovisjournal.georgetown.edu/journal/our-bodies-their-data-tracing-biopolitical-circuitry-the-illness-experience-on-patientslikeme-com/, last accessed on 28.11.2024.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dana Mahr

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.